1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186 
Indian firm reprimanded
Page 64
If you've noticed an error in this article please click here to report it so we can fix it.
• A firm was severely criticized, last week, by Mr W. M. Levitt, Metropolitan deputy LA, for not taking seriously enough the matter of an 0 licence application. The firm, Oshwal Enterprises Ltd, of Bartholomew Road, London NW5, was applying for an 0 licence for one vehicle already in possession, two to be acquired within one year and a further five within a period of five years.
Oshwal Enterprises is a firm staffed entirely by Indians; the firm's representative, company secretary Mr Mohindra D. Shah, said that the regulations regarding maintenance and drivers' hours had been made clear to their employees. However, no evidence was produced to show that arrangements had been made for scheduled maintenance; neither had adequate provision been made for overnight parking for the vehicles in their possession. The company's application was, therefore, refused and the representative was advised to apply again only when he was sure the conditions of the licence were satisfied.