AT THE HEART OF THE ROAD TRANSPORT INDUSTRY.

Call our Sales Team on 0208 912 2120

Safe and legal load

25th July 1981, Page 7
25th July 1981
Page 7
Page 7, 25th July 1981 — Safe and legal load
Close
Noticed an error?
If you've noticed an error in this article please click here to report it so we can fix it.

Which of the following most accurately describes the problem?

AN AXLE overload on a veh operated by Orrell and Brew! (Transport) Ltd was descril as the classic conflict betw loading a vehicle safely loading it legally when the cc pany and one of its drib pleaded guilty before Wethe magistrates to overloadinE first axle.

For the Yorkshire Licens Authority, Michael Paterson s the vehicle concerned v+ stopped last December wl carrying pet food. The first s had a plated weight of 6,09f but when the vehicle +A weighed it showed an overk of around seven per cent.

When interviewed, Orre managing director said that drivers had been told to k with care, but in this case pallets had been loaded too forward.

Defending, John Hartley s the company was used to ha ling pet food but this partici. load would have been routin it had been placed on the vehi a few inches farther back.

In a letter to the court, dri. Bryan Fergusson said he alwi had his loads placed against front headboard because it v safer.

The magistrates fined t company £50 and Mr Ferguss £25.


comments powered by Disqus