AT THE HEART OF THE ROAD TRANSPORT INDUSTRY.

Call our Sales Team on 0208 912 2120

II A bid by Kentish haulier View Transport for an

24th March 1988, Page 22
24th March 1988
Page 22
Page 22, 24th March 1988 — II A bid by Kentish haulier View Transport for an
Close
Noticed an error?
If you've noticed an error in this article please click here to report it so we can fix it.

Which of the following most accurately describes the problem?

additional operating centre and three additional vehicles has been turned down by South Eastern Deputy Licensing Authority Arthur Mundy as unsuitable, although he rejected all but one of the environmental objections to the renewal.

The company, which holds a licence for two vehicles, had sought authority for an additional operating centre at Mill Lane, Frittenden.

Three local residents objected. One was ruled not to be within the vicinity, while a copy of the representation by another had not been received by the company.

At a hearing in December, evidence was given that on leaving the operating centre vehicles would normally turn right towards Frittenden Village along Mill Lane, the access to which was on a sharp bend. Following the adjournment of that hearing, a planning application by the company was refused by Tunbridge Wells Borough Council.