AT THE HEART OF THE ROAD TRANSPORT INDUSTRY.

Call our Sales Team on 0208 912 2120

Go-ahead for Alder

24th January 1981
Page 25
Page 25, 24th January 1981 — Go-ahead for Alder
Close
Noticed an error?
If you've noticed an error in this article please click here to report it so we can fix it.

Which of the following most accurately describes the problem?

HE South-eastern Traffic Area has removed fares conditions from the licences held by Alder Valley Services, despite objections from leading Borough Transport, supported by Berkshire County Coun

It was argued that Alder Valley night undercut Reading's fares. his would mean that further ;upport would be needed from he rates if services were not to )e reduced, and that would not )e in the public interest.

The Commissioners were told )f Alder Valley's proposal, put orward in 1979, which, if rea dopted by the company, would offer season tickets at a discount on the Reading Transport fares.

For Alder Valley it was said that Reading enjoyed advantages in relation to the number of picking-up points and frequency of services: these would not be harmed by fares decontrol.

The Commissioners concluded that it was not in the public interest to retain or impose any conditions on Alder Valley's licences to keep fares in line with those of Reading Transport, and accepted that Alder Valley had no intention of waging a price war. The company had given an undertaking to the County that it would discuss all fares proposals with them.

In their decision, the Commissioners felt it was unlikely that Reading Transport would find it necessary either to cut services or seek further rate support.