1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140 
STRATHCLYDE'S GLEE ARRESTED
Page 96
If you've noticed an error in this article please click here to report it so we can fix it.
I WRITE to say I was disappointed in the way a Most eXCelleilt set of results for the Strathclyde PTE 1984/85 was summarised in your publication (CM, November 2).
While the heading -Strathclyde arrests years of declinewas encouraging, the Figures quoted for revenue support are completely misleading. Page 1.4 in the report states that the revenue support to the PTE bus operation has been significantly reduced over the past five years in the order of approximately 50 per cent ii) monetary terms or approximately 60 per cent in real terms, while still maintaining a similar level of service. This has been as a result of the Strathclyde policy of continually improving operational performance and reducing costs wherever possible. Alan R. Westwell
Director Genera!
Strarhdyde