AT THE HEART OF THE ROAD TRANSPORT INDUSTRY.

Call our Sales Team on 0208 912 2120

No shared routes

23rd June 1972, Page 33
23rd June 1972
Page 33
Page 33, 23rd June 1972 — No shared routes
Close
Noticed an error?
If you've noticed an error in this article please click here to report it so we can fix it.

Which of the following most accurately describes the problem?

• Two appeals by F. J. and J. A. Fry and CameIford Rural District Council have been dismissed by the Secretary of State for the Environment allowing an earlier partial grant to Fry for a road service licence for a stage carriage ser ice between Tintagel and Wadebridge and grant to H. G. Kinsman and Son Ltd for a road service licence for a circular stage c age service based on Wadebridge.

Fry had sought to extend to Tuesdays a stage service c rrently operated on Fridays only etween Tintagel and Wadebridge and rgued that local residents required more th a weekly service for shopping in neigh uring places.

Kinsman disp ted that there was a demand for more than one service a week from Boscastle, T tagel and Camelford. Its own service had en sustained throughout the winter but a y additional competition would detract fr m its already marginal degree of viability.

It was conclud d in the written decision that should insman be excluded from the comma portion of route there would be no ii ssibility of day-return journeys northwa d from Wadebridge and other stops.