AT THE HEART OF THE ROAD TRANSPORT INDUSTRY.

Call our Sales Team on 0208 912 2120

Impetition in oil incidental

23rd July 1983, Page 28
23rd July 1983
Page 28
Page 28, 23rd July 1983 — Impetition in oil incidental
Close
Noticed an error?
If you've noticed an error in this article please click here to report it so we can fix it.

Which of the following most accurately describes the problem?

NCIDENCE has a long arm. It ches out when an oil

ipany decides that a certain -ease in price is needed to er losses on petrol retailing I competitors immediately over that they require an itical amount. There is, of rse, no question of collusion I any talk of intercession by Monopolies and Mergers nmission is sheer mischief. /hen several companies ultaneously change their ids and reduce the increase a similar amount they are rely remaining competitive. a Government spokesman ured the House of Commons, re is considerable

ipetition in the oil industry. brtunately, this is more 'went to him than to other sumers.

ut if we on the mainland 'plain of fuel prices, spare a ught for residents in the ittish Isles. Even before the 3nt increase in the price of rol it cost £2.19 a gallon in

his was one of the reasons a complaint to The Times by oll resident that, while the /ernment was spending vast is on the Falklands, many all islands around the coast of am n were fighting for survival 'hist enormous economic ssures. It is no bad thing to lember that charity begins at ne.