1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200 
'Outrageous'
21st June 1968, Page 128
21st June 1968
Page 128
Page 128, 21st June 1968
— 'Outrageous'
Close
Noticed an error?
If you've noticed an error in this article please click here to report it so we can fix it.
If you've noticed an error in this article please click here to report it so we can fix it.
• Inconvenience to the court and objectors caused by the non-attendance of an applicant was described by Mr. J. Else, West Midland LA, as "outrageous" in Birmingham last week.
On May 15 Mr. Foley Egginton had applied for an adjournment of an application for a new B licence for six tippers by Hughes and Green and Co., Birmingham, for the attendance of some 20 witnesses. However, due to the lack of co-operation from his clients, he had withdrawn from the case before the second hearing.
Mr. Else, refusing the application, said the company had not even had the courtesy to attend and ask for an adjournment although he would not have granted it anyway, he concluded.