AT THE HEART OF THE ROAD TRANSPORT INDUSTRY.

Call our Sales Team on 0208 912 2120

Compensation for overtime sacking

21st December 1989
Page 17
Page 17, 21st December 1989 — Compensation for overtime sacking
Close
Noticed an error?
If you've noticed an error in this article please click here to report it so we can fix it.

Which of the following most accurately describes the problem?

IN A driver sacked by South Wales haulier John Benyon Evans & Son, after he changed his mind about working overtime, has been awarded 0,402 compensation for unfair dismissal, by a Cardiff industrial tribunal.

The tribunal was told that the driver, A W Aston, had to work overtime under his contract of employment.

According to the company,

1,4

6 6

Aston was first asked to work overtime on the morning of Friday 16 December last year.

Aston had already worked his 60-hour contracted week plus seven hours overtime. According to the company, he was told at 11:30hrs that he would be required to take a load to Huddersfield for delivery the following day, and that when Aston refused at 18:30hrs he was changing his mind, when it was difficult to find another driver. Aston said that the Friday night was his last opportunity of seeing his mother-in-law before the New Year. If he went to Huddersfield he would have to get up at 03:30hrs. He never had the chance to explain this, and was merely sacked.

The tribunal was satisfied that if the company had acted in a reasonable way, Aston would not have been dismissed. However, it was also satisfied that Aston had contributed to his own dismissal.

Tags


comments powered by Disqus