1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136 
A. J. P. Wilding writes: Details published in the report
20th October 1967, Page 82
20th October 1967
Page 82
Page 82, 20th October 1967
— A. J. P. Wilding writes: Details published in the report
Close
Noticed an error?
If you've noticed an error in this article please click here to report it so we can fix it.
If you've noticed an error in this article please click here to report it so we can fix it.
referring to the standard D750 were based on information given by Dorman. There was no reason to doubt this as the 360 cu.in. diesel is an option in the D750 and the Minimec pump has been fitted to this power unit. But Ford has confirmed that the engine must have been the 330 cu.in, as the 360 cu.in. option was not introduced until after the Dorman vehicle was built. As Mr. Bromson says, it is interesting that the 102.5 bhp engine gave a better performance than the 107 bhp Dorman (except on the hill climb). And also that the higher-powered engine gave a better fuel consumption. —Ed.