AT THE HEART OF THE ROAD TRANSPORT INDUSTRY.

Call our Sales Team on 0208 912 2120

0-licence in jeopardy after tacho offences

20th March 2008, Page 23
20th March 2008
Page 23
Page 23, 20th March 2008 — 0-licence in jeopardy after tacho offences
Close
Noticed an error?
If you've noticed an error in this article please click here to report it so we can fix it.

Which of the following most accurately describes the problem?

FALSIFICATION OF tachograph records by John Smith Transport's one driver could lead to the loss of the company's 0-licence.

The Poulton-Le-Fylde-based company. which currently holds a licence for one vehicle and one trailer and was seeking to increase the authorisation to three vehicles and three trailers, had been called before the North Western Deputy Traffic Commissioner, Elizabeth Perrett.

There had been a previous public inquiry conducted back in 2004 when drivers' hours and tachograph offences had also been the issue.

The traffic examiner, Sarah Dalton, explained that the driver, Allen Pearson, had interfered with the tachograph by winding the clock back.

Comparisons made with other documents showed that he had "tipped off the card" repeatedly, and, on one occasion, a break had been drawn in by hand. Pearson was subsequently convicted of 32 offences and ordered to pay fines and costs of £1,365.

Asked why there were a lack of tachograph charts after 11 December 2006, the managing director and transport manager, John Smith, said they had been destroyed when the vehicle was involved in an accident the following month. The DTC agreed there were no obvious hours offences on the face of the charts.

Admitting that he "took the card out" when it would have revealed excess hours. Pearson said that it had been quite common for him to only have four hours' sleep.

He was aware that what he was doing was illegal, but it was the only way to get the job done, and Smith had told him not to "run bent".

For the firm, Mike Cunningham said that the infringements, which did not involve enormous amounts of time or mileage, had only been identified through a process of forensic examination and crossreferencing with other documents that had not been available to the company at the time.


comments powered by Disqus