AT THE HEART OF THE ROAD TRANSPORT INDUSTRY.

Call our Sales Team on 0208 912 2120

ction e r cedent

20th July 1979, Page 7
20th July 1979
Page 7
Page 7, 20th July 1979 — ction e r cedent
Close
Noticed an error?
If you've noticed an error in this article please click here to report it so we can fix it.

Which of the following most accurately describes the problem?

• ESPONSIBILITY for sal by auction of a vehicle so the vendor and not the tio eer, according to a Ise if Lords judgement this k. I he sale in the appeal a as covered by a cerat which stated that the ici was "To be sold as seen L th all its faults and io warranty."

he vendor, who had beed that the vehicle was ge us and should not be 'en had failed to make his vs known to British Car tio s, who sold the vehicle hi . SCA said in evidence t ey would have advised ch sers of the vendor's v h d it been made known. v hicle was subsequently alv d in an accident, killing d -ver and seriously inng me of the passengers. he Lords Diplock, Is am, Keith of Kinkel, cr an and Viscount ior e were unanimous in nis ing the appeal on the un 15 that the vendor had iw but not revealed the id l was unfit to drive.

he e was a valid MOT test .ifi i ate for the vehicle but it b en earlier held that a c rtificate is valid at the e f issue and not necesly ubsequently.