AT THE HEART OF THE ROAD TRANSPORT INDUSTRY.

Call our Sales Team on 0208 912 2120

Ise Impression

20th August 1965, Page 31
20th August 1965
Page 31
Page 31, 20th August 1965 — Ise Impression
Close
Noticed an error?
If you've noticed an error in this article please click here to report it so we can fix it.

Which of the following most accurately describes the problem?

publication of an application for low-loader on B licence by John (Plant) Ltd., of Alveston. Strat,?on-Avon, gave a false impression at the vehicle would he used, it lleged at Birmingham on Friday. . C. Simpson, objecting for British Services, claimed that if other -s operating low-loaders in the Midlands had heard the evidence .00, would have wanted to object. omer evidence had been given, Mr. NI went on, of a required 300 lents a year, which did not seem in lance with the applicant's declara

f intention that the vehicle would .t.d for hire and reward for only 15 per cent of its time.

pite this plea, the West Midland y Licensing Authority; Mr. R. granted a licence to carry building antractors' plant and materials for Contractors Ltd. and E. J. Ellison b. within 120 miles and for other riers within 40 miles. Three other Es, two at present operating on C

and one to he acquired, were

d on 13 licence.

ienting the case for Littler, Mr. an Carless explained that his clients U the vehicles on B licence because eared that in some operations they close to breaking the law. There hree (mans of operation for which hides would be used. he said. The was hauling the company's own then there was the carrying of for subsidiary company J. L. Coors, and plant which the applicants elves had hired.

s appeared to be covered by C

e under Section 164 (5) of the Act, [tied Mr. Carless, but was arguable, us clients felt it would be best to the safe side. The only definite tion that would require a B licence he occasional movement for other with whom they were associated.