1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244 
IN YOUR OPINION
Page 186
If you've noticed an error in this article please click here to report it so we can fix it.
New Hope of Fair Rates I HAVE followed with great interest your progress on the subject "Those Tipper Rates ", and would like to congratulate you and, of course, the operators, who have had the courage and foresight to make the Fife and District
Tipper Operators Association such a success. _
Some time ago I stated to your Manchester otlice, that in the main customers in the York area would always pay a fair and reasonable rate, for haulagework originating within the area. Since then I regret that the position has deteriorated mainly because of operators not sticking together and charging the small increases recommended from time to time by our association.
However, the success of the -Fife tipper operators has given me new hope that now at long last operators of general haulage vehicles will be willing to co-operate and get rates on -to a fair and reasonable footing. With this object in mind I would deem it a favour if you would be good enough to let me have 50 reprints of the article publishedin The Commercial Motor, April 17, which .1 propose to circulate to operators together with a covering letter asking them to attend a meeting when we could all put our views forward and possibly form a similar group to safeguard our interests in York.
I have had this move in mind for several years, but it is mainly because .:of your efforts that I can now see a possibility of what only last week was a pipe dream now becoming a reality.
York.W. D. MITCHELL.
No Licensing—No Contracts in Jersey I AM operating an owner-driver service in the Channel I Islands and would like to quote the Jersey haulage rates for you to compare with those on the mainland:
Hire of lorry per hour 15s. 6d.
Chippings and gt'avel per ton 3s.
Sand per load 30s.
Concrete blocks (18 in. by 9 in by 4 in,) lid, each
(300 blocks per load).
Concrete blocks (18 in. by 9 in. by 6 in.) 2d. each
(200 blocks per load).
These rates are what. I operate on and are the top rates chargeable on the Island. I was refused membership of the Jersey Haulage Association but still charge the top rates listed above. As I own a newsagent's shop I was able to remain independent and refuse cut-price work. The Haulage Association has not held a meeting for nearly two years —so I no longer worry about joining. I have only two
c42
customers, who fortunately keep me in full-time work. They pay the full rate without: question, -but the majority of builders will-pay only the rates listed below:
Hire of lorry per hour its. 6d., 12s: 6d. and 'I3s. 6d..
Chippings per ton 2s. 6d. .
Blocks per load (unloaded by hand) 20s.
Sand per load 20s 4 •
And hauliers on the .mainland think they have worries over rates!. There is no licensing and nci authority here whatsoever. To My knowledge, drivers' hoursand overloading have never yet been checked. There, are no contracts at_all—lorries are hired from day to day on a casual
basis. • •• If I thought I could find haulage work at home in Derbyshire 1 would return to England. The thought of having
to re-establish, myself all over again has, however, put me off. I am expecting delivery of a new Austin FIIK 7-ton tipper tomorrow which, I hope, will Satisfy my customers that their 15s. 6d. an hour is well Spent. One advantage here—dery costs only 2s. 9d. a gallon.
St. Helier, Jersey. . BERNARD SHAW.
M.P.s Should Know their Subject IF your report on page 39 of The Commercial Motor dated I April 17 is accurate, I think it is time Members of Parliament made sure they know their subject before asking questions in the House. It is apparent that the Hon. Member for Thurrock knows little about goods vehicle licensing. If he did he would not be so disturbed that the objectors to the particularl application to which he refers were all engaged in road haulage. He would know that they were merely exercising the right conferred upon them to object to an application for a licence, in an effort to protect their own business.
Mr. Delargy's remarks about licensing tribunals were, I imagine, reference to the road/rail negotiating procedure, and if that is so he would be advised to make himself familiar with the part played by the nationalized road/rail organization (so beloved of the Labour party) in this negotiation machinery, as it is only after the negotiating committee is fully satisfied of the merits of an application considered by it, that the folms of withdrawal of objection are sent to the objectors, and then by the secretary of the committee.
I wonder, too, how the Road Haulage Association, with its 17,000 members, feels about Mr. Delargy's suggestion that it is being dominated by the eight operators named? I think I am right in saying that one of them, B.R.S. (Pickfords) Ltd., is not even a member of the Association.
London, E.1. S. DAVIS, Director, Davis Bros. (Haulage) Ltd.