AT THE HEART OF THE ROAD TRANSPORT INDUSTRY.

Call our Sales Team on 0208 912 2120

Extinguisher fine

19th September 1991
Page 18
Page 18, 19th September 1991 — Extinguisher fine
Close
Noticed an error?
If you've noticed an error in this article please click here to report it so we can fix it.

Which of the following most accurately describes the problem?

• Failure to carry a fire extinguisher on a 3.5-tonne van carrying drums of highly inflammable material has cost Archbold Freightage £500 in fines and costs at Huddersfield magistrates court.

Keith King, prosecuting for the Health & Safety Executive, said the van, which was carrying four drums of Avron Acrylic Dispersion, had been stopped in a hazchem check at Ainlay Top in April, The chemical contained methyl metylacrylate monomer and was highly flammable, with a flashpoint below 21° Defending, Christopher Charlesworth said that the driver had been properly trained and the company had done everything it could to comply with the regulations. He said that problems had arisen because the material was carried in 205-litre drums which meant it was regarded as a dangerous substance. Hazchempak regulations do not apply to drums under 200 litres.