AT THE HEART OF THE ROAD TRANSPORT INDUSTRY.

Call our Sales Team on 0208 912 2120

Low-loader not low enough: driver fined 120

19th November 1971
Page 31
Page 31, 19th November 1971 — Low-loader not low enough: driver fined 120
Close
Noticed an error?
If you've noticed an error in this article please click here to report it so we can fix it.

Which of the following most accurately describes the problem?

• Saying that it would have been proper to have checked the height of his load and that anyone carrying exceptional loads would be well advised to check the proposed route with the police or highway authority, Thetford magistrates fined a Bury St Edmunds lowloader driver £20 last week.

The driver, Mr D. Aitkens, denied transporting a load on a trailer which was unsuited to the use and, which the prosecution alleged, was dangerous.

The court was told that the load, a JCB excavator, had been collected from a site on Al 1 and was being taken to Bury St Edmunds. On the route was a recently installed pedestrian footbridge over the road, it was 17ft 5in. high but the load had hit it in the span causing considerable damage to the structure. The centre span was cracked and buckled beyond repair and the total damage amounted to £2500.

Mr Aitkens said that he had been driving behind a boxvan and did not have very good visibility forward. He knew the road well but did not know of the new bridge. "The first thing I know about it," he said. "was the impact."

Tags

People: D. Aitkens

comments powered by Disqus