1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136 
lake-by-make lutput figures
Page 55
If you've noticed an error in this article please click here to report it so we can fix it.
Although still incomplete, a list of proiction figures for cars and commercial :hicks, make-by-make, just published by e SMMT is the first such detailed breakawn which the industry has made public. The tabulated figures appear in a new MMT periodical Motor Industry Reporting, itended chiefly for MPs.
The booklet reveals that the SMMT is iscussing a type approval scheme for .eight containers with the Ministry of 'echnology, Board of Trade, Lloyd's Legister of. Shipping and other interested odies.
The breakdown of production figures bows that commercial vehicle totals for 967 were: BMC, 107,099; Ford 93,861; .,eyland Motor Corporation, 23,994; Rootes including Dodge) 29,212; Vauxhall (Bedbra 89,296; Jaguar (Daimler, Guy), 2,601; over (including Alvis), 31,282; Atkinson )79; Bristol 759; other (including Dennis, Foden, Seddon and S and D). 6.007.
For comparison, 1966 totals were: BMC 109,518; Ford 113,623; Leyland group, 25,507; Rootes 40,998; Vauxhall 101,897; faguar (Daimler, Guy), 2,126; Rover 35,667; Atkinson 1,033; Bristol 727; Reliant 1,688; other 5,891. Totals were 1967: 385,090; 1966: 438,675.