1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136 
Full o-m-o agreement or no bonus
Page 32
If you've noticed an error in this article please click here to report it so we can fix it.
• Doubts have been expressed about clarity of paragraph 97 of the Natic Board for Prices and Incomes Report No (Productivity Agreements in the Bus Inc try).
The paragraph reads: "in recognition these factors [the effects of the introduct of one-man operation], we think that 10 week, in the form of a bonus, would in first instance be an appropriate amount pay all platform staff in each garage wh a firm Agreement can be secured, or alre; exists, for the introduction and extensior single-manning.'
Some people have been wondering whc er this means that the lOs bonus will payable only where unions are party tc signed agreement to the introduction total one-man operation over an agr period.
According to spokesmen from both Ministry of Transport and the Prices ; Incomes Board, it does. The spokesman the Prices and Incomes Board told ( that he considered the capital A in the wi Agreement to be most relevant. There mi he said, be a formal agreement, and t "with no strings attached".