AT THE HEART OF THE ROAD TRANSPORT INDUSTRY.

Call our Sales Team on 0208 912 2120

Asbestos not fine-proof

18th October 1980
Page 22
Page 22, 18th October 1980 — Asbestos not fine-proof
Close
Noticed an error?
If you've noticed an error in this article please click here to report it so we can fix it.

Which of the following most accurately describes the problem?

AN OPERATOR has been fined £50 by magistrates in Grays, Essex, after they heard that the driver of the vehicle had let him down. The operator, Barry Earl Rowe, of Newton Abbot, pleaded guilty to running a vehicle that was overloaded on its second and third axles.

Mr Rowe's solicitor said that when the vehicle was stopped at Tankhill Road, Purfleet, on March 3, it was carrying 15 tons of asbestos but was capable of carrying 16.5 tons.

The problem, he said, was that the load had not been distributed properly, which resulted in an excess weight of 8.7 per cent on the axles.

The solicitor told the court that Mr Rowe had warned his driver, James Cox, about the distribution problem and that he was even given a diagram to assist him in loading the vehicle. Despite this the load was still not properly distributed.

It was alleged that the "negligent" driver had let down his employer and that it was Mr Rowe who was to be punished for a fault for which he was not personally to blame. Despite the pleas, Mr Rowe, who was in court, was fined £50 and ordered to pay £10 towards the cost of the prosecution.