1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200 
THIS ALARMING QUESTION—BY Mr. TURNER
17th March 1967, Page 61
17th March 1967
Page 61
Page 61, 17th March 1967
— THIS ALARMING QUESTION—BY Mr. TURNER
Close
Noticed an error?
If you've noticed an error in this article please click here to report it so we can fix it.
If you've noticed an error in this article please click here to report it so we can fix it.
RHA chairman Mr. Philip Turner put the great Freightliner controversy "Into perspective" at the South Wales area annual dinner last week.
Even better methods of carrying traffic would be evolved, he said. And the alarming question the three-year-long Freightliner battle posed was: "Are we to suffer the same sort of obstruction everytime a new and better method of carrying goods is devised?"
Said Mr. Turner: "We must take steps to see that in any similar situation the only consideration should be the benefit to trade and industry. Where road and rail are both involved as with liner trains, co-operation all the way through and at every level would appear to offer the best chance of success."