AT THE HEART OF THE ROAD TRANSPORT INDUSTRY.

Call our Sales Team on 0208 912 2120

WATCH YOUR LOSS OF USE CLAIM

17th February 1967
Page 96
Page 96, 17th February 1967 — WATCH YOUR LOSS OF USE CLAIM
Close
Noticed an error?
If you've noticed an error in this article please click here to report it so we can fix it.

Which of the following most accurately describes the problem?

INSURANCE coverage is topical and it may be as well to look at one aspect of it which is important to the fleet user: "Loss of use". If you are covered for loss of use you may believe that you can dash off and replace your car with one of a similar type when you are involved in an accident. You should proceed with caution.

Earlier this month a company director whose car—a £2,250 Jensen (1966) was damaged in a crash lost a claim for E410. The Jensen took 71 weeks to repair and during the period the director used a hired Rover 100 and a 3.8 Jaguar. The director claimed he wanted a car with the same prestige value. Three appeal court judges took a different view. Lord Justice Sellars said that a Ford Zephyr would have been a reasonable equivalent car to hire and this would have cost £185 hire charges for the same period.

A loss of use clause seldom states specifically what you are entitled to in replacement but as a result of this judgement fleet operators would be well advised to consult their insurers before hiring.

Tags


comments powered by Disqus