AT THE HEART OF THE ROAD TRANSPORT INDUSTRY.

Call our Sales Team on 0208 912 2120

'No increase likely'

16th October 1982
Page 5
Page 5, 16th October 1982 — 'No increase likely'
Close
Noticed an error?
If you've noticed an error in this article please click here to report it so we can fix it.

Which of the following most accurately describes the problem?

LY EIGHTEEN people, CM's reporter and two interlopers from Freight Transport Association included, braved the night air to md a fringe meeting held in Brighton by Transport 2000, after FTA's better-attended session aversham MP Roger Moate, foot from the FTA meeting, he understood the impati;e of the industry which has in "tantalised by heavier lor;", but said it would be noth short of political lunacy for Government to try to inase lorry weights in its last ir before a general election.

ie said he accepted that many ge fleet operators would iefit from being able to carry ivier loads in their vehicles, I so reduce their fleets, but d: "Our job as politicians is to t the balance right. We must ablish a price to the economy a whole."

Ar Moate was prepared to cept the FTA's figure of 50m a year in savings, but Id this only amounted" to a lth of a penny in the Et and it a much greater saving to iustry could arise from a 10p 20p cut in tax paid on derv. And he went on to suggest it a £150m a year saving in erating costs could be wiped t by increased dery costs, hide excise duty changes, or an alteration in the calculations of track costs.

UB Distribution Services' Alan West said that the transport industry does not want a hand-out from the Government in the form of dery tax relief. "This saving comes from a genuine increase in efficiency," he said.


comments powered by Disqus