Tribunal's Direction Quoted
Page 53
If you've noticed an error in this article please click here to report it so we can fix it.
EN a predominantly A-licensed perator experienced difficulty over aangeability with B-1 icen se d es, the Transport Tribunal had said n A licence should not be granted B-licence conditions could be satisily altered. Mr. J. H. A. Randolph, hire Deputy Licensing Authority, old this last week when Frank is (Haulage), Ltd., successfully I a B licence for five vehicles with ions up to 16 miles.
• company were mainly A-licence ors, said Mr. R. Waite, but their licences had varying conditions and Phillips were advised to apply for bstitution of art A licence and this ranted in October, 1958. It was iwed, however, after an appeal last June. Operations under A licence had been allowed pending the new application, and during this period the difficulties had been removed.
Mr. J. Phillips, a director, said that they hoped by the present application to maintain their improved position. During the past six months, the five vehicles had earned £5,323, or £372 per ton of unladen weight.
. NEW ROADS WANTED
THE new Parliament would be taking a backward step if it did not immediately display interest in a brand new road programme, said a spokesman for the Roads Campaign Council last Friday when commenting on the result of the Election.