• Home
• Used vehicles
• Product news
• Dealer news
• Compliance
• Buying advice
• Archive

123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960616263646566676869707172737475767778798081828384858687888990919293949596979899100101102103104105106107108109110111112113114115116117118119120121122

Unsettled load

Zoom page

16th November 1989

Page 24

Page 24, 16th November 1989 — Unsettled load

Close

Noticed an error?
If you've noticed an error in this article please click here to report it so we can fix it.

Which of the following most accurately describes the problem?

Please select an option... Headline has errors Article text has errors Article is incomplete Submit

• Overloading charges brought against Lanstar (Astley), and one of the company's drivers, were dismissed after the Ross-on-Wye Magistrates were told that time had not been allowed for the load of fuel to settle before a tanker was weighed at the DTp's split plate weighbridge at Ross.

The magistrates ordered the Traffic Area to pay £400 towards the defence costs, after John Backhouse, defending, said the refusal of the driver's request for the tanker to be reweighed had caused very great expense.