AT THE HEART OF THE ROAD TRANSPORT INDUSTRY.

Call our Sales Team on 0208 912 2120

Michael Stirrup fined for fraud

16th May 1991, Page 16
16th May 1991
Page 16
Page 16, 16th May 1991 — Michael Stirrup fined for fraud
Close
Noticed an error?
If you've noticed an error in this article please click here to report it so we can fix it.

Which of the following most accurately describes the problem?

• North Manchester haulier Michael Stirrup has been ordered to pay fines, costs and back duty totalling £4,180.83 for using two vehicles with identical registration numbers and documentation by Middleton magistrates.

Stirrup, trading as Central Transport of Middleton, admitted fraudulently using a vehicle excise licence, making a false declaration on a vehicle excise

1,4

6 6

licence application form, fraudulently using a vehicle registration mark, using a Ministry plate with intent to deceive, using a vehicle without an excise licence, using a vehicle without an Operator's Licence, and using a vehicle without a test certificate.

Prosecuting, Katherine Greenwood said that Stirrup had been running two identical Bedfords with the same registration plates and documents. When asked for an explanation Stirrup had said he had bought one of the vehicles from a scrap yard and was doing it up. His business had suffered financially as he had been undercut by a firm in Liverpool running illegally. He had thought he would get a few months cheap running out of the spare vehicle to get him out of financial difficulty and had obtained a duplicate excise licence by saying that the original had been lost. Magistrates fined Stirrup £2,950 and ordered him to pay £1,160.83 back duty.


comments powered by Disqus