1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152 
HOW LOW IS LOW?
Page 28
If you've noticed an error in this article please click here to report it so we can fix it.
• Your recent supplement covering light vehicles (Commercial Motor 19-25 May) was most interesting, especially the article "Van Evaluations: How
they compare", but I would wish to make an observation concerning one of the expert's comments.
It was concerning the Citroen C25 panel van (and its SEVEL brothers) stating that "If the floor was even lower, it would be ideal". Well now, we at AL-K0 B&B offer a fullyapproved alternative chassis, for the chassis cab variants of this front-wheel-drive unit, that Lowers the top of the chassis some 170mm. This gives an unladen height of around 500mm — and nearer 400mm laden!!
This chassis has been manufacturered for three to four years now, and is used in applications where low floor levels are particularly advantageous, such as minibuses, vans (for double-glazing or 20ft x 10ft mobile bill-post boards), car transporter and motor home, etc.
A J Hastewell,
Sales manager, AL-K0 B &B, Royal Leamington Spa, Warwickshire.