AT THE HEART OF THE ROAD TRANSPORT INDUSTRY.

Call our Sales Team on 0208 912 2120

Acorn fined on tachos

16th August 1986, Page 15
16th August 1986
Page 15
Page 15, 16th August 1986 — Acorn fined on tachos
Close
Noticed an error?
If you've noticed an error in this article please click here to report it so we can fix it.

Which of the following most accurately describes the problem?

• A West Midland company which operated six vehicles not specified on its operator's licence has been ordered to pay fines and costs totalling £650 by the Atherstone magistrates.

Acorn (Nuneaton) admitted six specimen offences of using a vehicle without an operator's licence and was fined £100 per offence with .i!50 costs.

Barbara Stubbs, prosecuting for the West Midlands Licensing Authority said that in November 1985 a traffic examiner inspected the company's tachograph charts for October and November. Ile discovered charts of six vehicles not authorised on the company's 0-licence. Three of the vehicles concerned were specified on an 0-licence held in the Eastern traffic area by Kenneth McCreath. When interviewed about the offences the company representative had said that there was no problem with three vehicles as they were specified on a sub-contractor's licence.

For the company it was said that it was a large, responsible company with a number of subsidiaries. It employed a lot of people and the offences were all due to administrative mistakes. The person responsible had since left the company's employment.