1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188 
Residents absent from Windle case
Page 25
If you've noticed an error in this article please click here to report it so we can fix it.
• Halifax-based J T Windle was granted an additional six vehicles and trailers after neighbouring residents, who had made environmental representations against the application, failed to attend a Leeds public inquiry, before North Eastern Licensing Authority Frederick Whalley.
The company had applied for the vehicles and trailers to be added to a licence for eight vehicles and trailers based at the Shay Lane Industrial Estate.
For Windle, Gary Hodgson said that he doubted whether the three residents who had made representations could be classed as being within the vicinity of the operating centre. The representations were in respect of the use of Shay Lane, which was a public road. It was the main road into the industrial estate and was used by many vehicles that had nothing to do with Windle. In such circumstances, the residents really had no valid representations.