AT THE HEART OF THE ROAD TRANSPORT INDUSTRY.

Call our Sales Team on 0208 912 2120

VEHICLE: Subaru Sumo vans (4 x2 and 4 x4).

15th June 1989, Page 152
15th June 1989
Page 152
Page 152, 15th June 1989 — VEHICLE: Subaru Sumo vans (4 x2 and 4 x4).
Close
Noticed an error?
If you've noticed an error in this article please click here to report it so we can fix it.

Which of the following most accurately describes the problem?

GVW: 1,435kg.

Tested payload: 4 x 4, 495kg-,

4x2, 540kg.

Fuel consumption (laden): 4x4, 7.891it/100km (35.81mpg); 4x2, 7.7711t/ 100km (36.41mpg).

Average speed (laden): 4x4, 64.441un/h (40.05mph); 4x2, 63.9km/h (39.75mph). Body volume: 2.63m3.

Price: 4x4, £4,900 ex-VAT; 4x2, 24,100 ex-VAT.

The two little Subaru vans were tested back-to-back, although their drivelines differ. The 4x2 has a 997cc three-cylinder petrol engine; the 4x4 van has a 1,189cc four-cylinder unit. They share the same transaxle-based five-speed gearboxes, with the 4x4 van having an electrically activated drive to the front wheels.

We liked the load space, and compared it favourably with the Bedford Rascal microvan. The interior and the driving position was one of the most accommodating we had come across. Access to the engines wasn't bad with the rear bumper hinging down and an additional access panel on the rear of the floor.

The performance of both vehicles could be best described as nippy, and especially good around town. The 4x4 was limited in its off-road ability, but it did manage to restart on a 33% (1-in-3) hill.

We were not over-happy with the handling of either Surrios as the suspension gave limited wheel travel. They were also susceptible to side winds. Our main reservations were about the crash protections of forward-control micros, and this is now being studied at the Transport Road Research Laboratory (TRRL).

Tags


comments powered by Disqus