1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192 
One-grand fine for multiple offences
Page 32
If you've noticed an error in this article please click here to report it so we can fix it.
A SCAFFOLDING FIRM has totted up tines and costs of £1,050 for a string of licensing and insurance offences. When Barclay Scaffolding& Cradle ofWestcliffe-on-Sea appeared before Barking magistrates it was fined £75 for permitting a driver to drive without a licence, £300 for using a vehicle without insurance, £350 for having no 0-licence, and £150 for using an 0-licence identity disc with intent to deceive, pith £175 costs.
Anthony Ostrin, prosecuting for VOSA, said tha when a two-axled vehicle carrying scaffolding wa, stopped in a roadside check the driver was unable n produce his current tachograph chart.
Enquiries revealed that the driver was not qualifiec to drive that class of vehicle, so the insurance for tip vehicle was invalid. It was displaying a restricted 0 licence disc issued to an individual:That gave the im pression that the limited company held a licence whei in fact it did not; and that represented a deception.
For the company,Terence Massett said the previou partnership had changed to a limited company an had failed to update its records,They had rectified th position as soon as possible.