1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186 
Repute depends on undertaking
Page 7
If you've noticed an error in this article please click here to report it so we can fix it.
SYNTEX LOGISTICS can contrnue trading as long as an employee with Irks to a firm that lost its licence is not involved with its management.
The Felixstowe-based business appeared before Eastern Traffic Commissioner Geoffrey Simms to defend its repute after it emerged that Hussein Ahmed, an ex-director of 3PL Solutions, was employed by the company.
Simms had refused to grant an 0-licence to 3PL Solutions after the bosses of Hanbury Davies and W Carter Haulage alleged that Ahmed might be running away from his debts (CM 26 October 2006). This followed Ahmed's attempt to buy the assets of his previous company, Gipping Container Services, from administrators.
Simms decided Syntex Logistics retained its good repute and granted a variation application — but extracted an undertaking on Ahmed's role in the company.
A spokeswoman for the Eastern Traffic Area Office says: The licensed operator undertakes to make proper arrangements so that, notwithstanding the description of Hussein Ahmed in the context of his employment as a manager, [he] is not, and will not, be concerned directly or indirectly in any managerial aspect of Syntex Logistics." Director Nicholas Lindsay declined to comment.