AT THE HEART OF THE ROAD TRANSPORT INDUSTRY.

Call our Sales Team on 0208 912 2120

Non-Stop held up over impounded vehicle

15th February 2007
Page 34
Page 34, 15th February 2007 — Non-Stop held up over impounded vehicle
Close
Noticed an error?
If you've noticed an error in this article please click here to report it so we can fix it.

Which of the following most accurately describes the problem?

Keywords : Traffic Law

ER1TH, LONDON-BASED Non-Stop, whose sole director,David Humphries, had his 0-licence revoked last July, has lost its bid for the return of an impounded vehicle before the South-Eastern and Metropolitan Traffic Commissioner Christopher Heaps.

The vehicle had been stopped in November 2006 at a vehicle check point in Tunnel] Avenue, London while loaded with sand, asphalt and pipes. It was displaying an expired 0-licence disc and the driver said he was employed by Humphries. In seeking the ret urn of the vehicle, Humphries said the company had applied for a two-vehicle licence in October and he thought it was able to operate. He conceded that he had been told by a traffic examiner that this was not so, advice that was subsequently confirmed by his transport consultant.

Humphries admitted the vehicle had been used since the licence revocation in July, and acknowledged that he had seen a letter from theTraffic Area refusing an interim licence. It warned that the company could not operate. He was unable to give any reason for not accepting that advice.

Refusing to return the vehicle,theTC said he found that Humphries was aware of the requirements of the 0-licensing legislation. He had held an 0-licence and had been the nominated transport manager under that licence, thus demonstrating professional competence. Humphries had failed to demonstrate that he understood that the vehicle should not have been operated.

Tags

Locations: LONDON

comments powered by Disqus