1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172 
Irakes onus )ut on md
Page 43
If you've noticed an error in this article please click here to report it so we can fix it.
7ECTIVE vehicles belongto J. W. Fisher (Meats) Ltd Norwich, were the sole ionsibility of the company, its managing director, said iy appointed Eastern Lidng Authority Kenneth in Norwich.
titer, managing director Fisher had said many of defects listed on prohibis placed on the company's [cies should have been ,ted and reported by the ers.
at Mr Peter said that, ough drivers could be some responsibility, nately the blame lay with operator.
vidence was given by cle examiner, James Jones he had imposed three bhitions on the fourice fleet in June.
everal attempts had been le to examine the vehicles, Mr Fisher had been o-operative and had stioned his authority to .y out an inspection.
:e was also .asked who ld pay for taking the icles to a Department of nsport testing station, and )ne instance he had been I that if he, Mr Jones, fled a vehicle there, he have to drive it himself.
St appearance
Ir Jones refuted suggesIs that the defects had not n serious and said that on ection he now considered y would have warranted nediate prohibitions.
4r Fisher said he had been !rating vehicles for over 25 Lrs and this was the first e he had appeared at L.iplinary proceedings.
o convictions had ever .n recorded against the npany. The prohibitions arisen while the company was sending its vehicles into one particular garage and, that garage had since been changed.
The periods between inspections had been reduced and a system of driver defect reporting was being put into operation. Mr Peter issued a warning, and directed that a further fleet check be undertaken by vehicle examiners within nine months.