AT THE HEART OF THE ROAD TRANSPORT INDUSTRY.

Call our Sales Team on 0208 912 2120

False Evidence Put in by Objector

14th November 1958
Page 45
Page 45, 14th November 1958 — False Evidence Put in by Objector
Close
Noticed an error?
If you've noticed an error in this article please click here to report it so we can fix it.

Which of the following most accurately describes the problem?

L•VIDENCE put forward by E. A. Major and Sons (Transport), Ltd.. Highbridge, Somerset, when they objected to another haulier's application last September, was found to be incorrect, 'Mr. S. W. Nelson, Western Licensing Authority, heard on Tuesday. He was told that the company opposed an application by Mr. A. R. Duckett, West Huntspill, on the ground that they did not have enough traffic themselves. However, when a senior examiner went through their records he discovered that on some days when Major's claimed their vehicles were idle they had, in fact, been working. At Tuesday's hearing Mr. Major explained that the documents concerned had been prepared by a junior, and he had taken it for granted that they were correct. He had no intention of misleading Mr. Nelson. Accepting this statement, Mr. Nelson warned the company that proceedings could have been taken. However, the incident would not be held against them.

BUSES ON NEW BY-PASS?

WHEN the Preston by-pass is opened next month it will be used by Ribble Motor Services, Ltd., and their subsidiary. W. C. Standerwick, Ltd., if the North Western Traffic Commissioners agree. Standerwick's also want to operate along the London-Birmingham Motorway.

Tags

Locations: Preston, London

comments powered by Disqus