1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202 
VOSA Operator Rating Scheme is no joke
Page 28
If you've noticed an error in this article please click here to report it so we can fix it.
I READ WITH INTEREST the anonymous letter sent in by an operator regarding VOSA's proposed Operator's Rating Scheme (CM 31 March).We were sent a copy of the correspondence and,after checking with several branches of VOSA (who had not heard of it), we came to the conclusion it was a hoax and advised colleagues and clients alike. Imagine how amazed we were to receive several snotty replies from industry bodies informing us that they were fully aware of this initiative and it had been on the cards for years. What a shame it is that they felt that their members did not need to share the information.
We were intrigued, and contacted the VOSA official who had sent the letter. She discussed the matter openly and at length.The initiative is quite genuine, but is in the very early stages of a feasibility study.We arranged for her to visit our part of the world and address a meeting of those local road transport operators who could be affected. She presented the initiative clearly and effectively, giving those present the opportunity to put forward their views.
Points discussed ranged from concerns over the 'protection racket' through relative legalities of benefits, VOSA becoming self-funding etc.The consensus was that the requirement for such a scheme would be decided by UK operators; not by the unbidden whim of VOSA.
The replies to our original e-mail denouncement of the scheme, when set against the relative benefits gained by both sides at the forum, indicate that the pro-active approach will be more beneficial than the blinkered,knee jerk reaction no matter how well intentioned.
Mike Voyle Transport Consultant, Powerhouse TCS