AT THE HEART OF THE ROAD TRANSPORT INDUSTRY.

Call our Sales Team on 0208 912 2120

Appeal victory

13th June 2002, Page 10
13th June 2002
Page 10
Page 10, 13th June 2002 — Appeal victory
Close
Noticed an error?
If you've noticed an error in this article please click here to report it so we can fix it.

Which of the following most accurately describes the problem?

A Cardiff haulier who was fined for having an insecure and dangerous load has won the battle to clear his name. Paul Townsend, owner of Paul Townsend Transport, is now urging other operators not to be frightened of the authorities and to challenge decisions made against them.

Townsend was stopped last year by a policeman who claimed that his load of two aluminium ingots could become insecure and issued a fixed penalty of £60 with three penalty points.

He was then taken to the magistrates courts, but after waiting there for hours he was told that he had been found guilty in his absence. He later returned to the court and was fined £750. However, Townsend appealed to the Crown Court where he was given an absolute discharge.

"Everyone said that I should accept the fine," he says. "However, it wasn't the money but the principle of the thing. I knew that my load was secured carefully and it was just his word against my professional opinion. Even after the policeman had fined me for having a dangerous load he didn't stop me going back onto the motorway."