1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140 
1-1-1f standards are they safe?
Page 28
If you've noticed an error in this article please click here to report it so we can fix it.
\ICE AGAIN the public are iing tempted to carry out pairs on their vehicles by the I-Y magazines (recently Ivertised on the television). I realize that this is nothing :w, but I feel very concerned lout the standard of orkmanship that must go with is type of do-it-yourself. Just recently at a local main lents, a mechanic was sacked r not fitting a split pin into a eering component resulting in -1 accident. The point I am !eking is this: if the trained iechanic can fail on the odd 9r11, what does the 'experienced and ignorant D-Iman leave himself open to 'hen doing a safety repair? Do the odd adjustment, the )utine servicing and the panel ?.pairs, but not the major rakesteering work that has to ope with the speeds and udden decisions of modern lotoring.
Even after teaching for two ears at night school, various People from the street were not ip to this sort of repair let alone ist reading a magazine or book luring the week.
I cannot think of any easy iolution, but I for one would like o see some kind of check ;ystem, rather than wait for the iltimate result of a fitting nistake.
J. E. EASTMAN, AMIRTE, %Weigh, Essex.