AT THE HEART OF THE ROAD TRANSPORT INDUSTRY.

Call our Sales Team on 0208 912 2120

Fine threat for dismissal

13th April 2000, Page 11
13th April 2000
Page 11
Page 11, 13th April 2000 — Fine threat for dismissal
Close
Noticed an error?
If you've noticed an error in this article please click here to report it so we can fix it.

Which of the following most accurately describes the problem?

• Hauliers who fire their staff over health and safety disputes face fines of up to 00,000, warns a transport lawyer.

Ipswich lawyer Barker Gotelee says that drivers whose dismissal is based on complaints over safety issues are likely to receive compensation regardless of how long they have worked for the haulier Solicitor Deborah

Cross says: "If an employee is dismissed for refusing to work more than his permitted hours, or because he continuously raises safety issues about vehicles, the haulier may be

deemed to have acted unfairly and a tribunal will automatically find in favour of the driver."

Cross cites a recent example where a driver complained that the rope used for securing loads was unsuitable. He walked out and won his claim.

Cross adds that the two years' service normally required before an employee can claim unfair dismissal has been reduced to one year.

Hauliers are invited tojoin a Health and Safety Executive project to set up a code of practice for sheeting procedures for non-tipper trucks. IM Contact: System Concepts an 020 7240331R


comments powered by Disqus