1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184 
Deadline set for crane sideguards
Page 6
If you've noticed an error in this article please click here to report it so we can fix it.
Vosa has decided that vehicles with front-mounted cranes do need
sideguards — but not until April 2008. Oliver Dixon reports.
VOSA HAS LT-TURNED over the need for sideguards on trucks equipped with front-mounted cranes.
The sideguard legislation introduced in 1984 required continuous protection along the length of the vehicle, but the outriggers fitted with frontmounted cranes need a gap in the sideguards. This became custom and practice, but there have been a number of recent cases in which vehicles presented for MoT have failed for inadequate sideguards.
Vosa says: -The sideguard requirements are contained within the HGV Inspection Manual. In the year 2000, to simplify the test, examiners were advised not to measure sideguards, although the requirements remained in the manual to aid operator compliance.
"It was considered at that time that this would not have a notable affect on vehicle compliance. But towards the end of last year it was identified that vehicles were being presented for annual test with sideguard sections missing, in some cases where the vehicle had been non-compliant from new."
The spokesman adds that vehicles fitted with "short bodies" or sleeper cabs were identified as those most likely to have non-compliant sideguards due to the increased complexity of compliance. "Examiners have therefore been advised to consider carefully any vehicle where there appears to be a sideguard section missing as there remains a requirement to have sideguards fitted [as specified in the] regulations. The situation is currently being discussed with the trade associations."
However, this week Vosa issued a directive stating that until 1 April 2008 no vehicle should be failed for incomplete sideguards. Instead their operators will he advised that they are non-compliant and will fail in the future.
Vehicles presented after 1 April 2008 will have to be fitted with continuous guards. These will probably have to be detachable, as most crane controls would be in the path of the guards, and there are likely to be further issues with the siting of the crane when it is stowed for travel.