1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136 
Large haulier often offer selfish views
Page 18
If you've noticed an error in this article please click here to report it so we can fix it.
HAVING READ your artic 'Stobart calls for empty runnii tax', I am moved enough object to his proposal and ti coverage it gained, as it is cleat a further case of 'let's see he we can put our competitors o of business'.
Do you regard everythit large transport operators say, being right, or in this cm acceptable to the industry as whole? Far too often the views large companies are seen practical and intelligent, when fact they are selfish and il conceived mutterings of peop with nothing better to do.
Since the Stobart name can on the scene, how many Carlist based haulage operators hal ceased to exist?
If there should be at interfering with our industry should be for minimum rates at more importantly, a statutory 31 day payment rule. Both of the would affect Stobart, but direct help us small hauliers.
Dave Blume DBT