AT THE HEART OF THE ROAD TRANSPORT INDUSTRY.

Call our Sales Team on 0208 912 2120

Load case is quashed

11th February 1999
Page 23
Page 23, 11th February 1999 — Load case is quashed
Close
Noticed an error?
If you've noticed an error in this article please click here to report it so we can fix it.

Which of the following most accurately describes the problem?

A conviction for using a vehicle with an insecure load has been Quashed by Stoke-on-Trent Crown Court, Kingsbury-based John Goulding Heavy Haulage was fined £750 by Newcastleunder-Lyme magistrates after a vehicle shed part of its load on the M6.

For the company, Jonathan Lawton argued there was no evidence the company was the -user" of the vehicle. He said the appellant was a limited company and nowhere in the police interview with a John Goulding did the company's name appear or reference made to a limited company. Goulding had told a police officer he was the owner and the driver worked for him. There was no position of "owner" of a limited company, said Lawton. There was nothing in the interview to show that John Goulding Heavy Haulage was the owner of the vehicle.

Judge John Rubery said if a company was to be charged it had to be clear it was that company that was linked to the offence.


comments powered by Disqus