1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150 
iazard )arking
10th November 1978, Page 7
10th November 1978
Page 7
Page 7, 10th November 1978
— iazard )arking
Close
Noticed an error?
If you've noticed an error in this article please click here to report it so we can fix it.
If you've noticed an error in this article please click here to report it so we can fix it.
JEST Midlands Fire Brigade c ent 1 y discovered that lmost half the tankers carOng hazardous loads which 'ere parked in three Midland .?.rvice stations on the M5 and 16 did not have load idenification. The survey was rdered by the Fire Committee f the West Midlands County :ouncil.
An alarming result from the urvey was the lack of idenification of the loads because an emergency the fire serices need to know what a anker is carrying in order to arry out the correct fire ighting procedure.
From a total of 601 tankers nspected 291 had unidentified ontents, 117 contained letroleum spirit, 29 liquid ■ araffin, 60 various chemicals, ;5 acid and 26 pressurised gas.