1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150 
o type pproval
10th November 1978, Page 23
10th November 1978
Page 23
Page 23, 10th November 1978
— o type pproval
Close
Noticed an error?
If you've noticed an error in this article please click here to report it so we can fix it.
If you've noticed an error in this article please click here to report it so we can fix it.
20RDING to Bob Palmer, ?rintending engineer of the ), no commitment has been epted by the UK on types royal for commercial ides.
igid application of type royal would make it uneomical for specialist, lowame vehicles to be proed.
esting of components is ensive and sophisticated also requires that the aut[ties are satisified about the aufacturer's ability to ntain consistency in proLion.
we important variants had a included in type approval ears, so that it was possible manufacturers to apply for, aster's Approval Cerates for single cars. In adma engineers assessments, eh allow a vehicle to be ied by an engineer checkdata supplied by the ter, would eliminate the d for testing.