AT THE HEART OF THE ROAD TRANSPORT INDUSTRY.

Call our Sales Team on 0208 912 2120

Neighbours' objedions rule out early starts

8th April 2004, Page 33
8th April 2004
Page 33
Page 33, 8th April 2004 — Neighbours' objedions rule out early starts
Close
Noticed an error?
If you've noticed an error in this article please click here to report it so we can fix it.

Which of the following most accurately describes the problem?

RESIDENTS' CONCERNS won the day when a haulier's application for extra vehicles was granted on condition that none leave the yard before 7am or on Sundays or public holidays.

Kevin Franks of Sidlesham, near Chichester, had applied to double his fleet with the addition of two vehicles and two trailers based at his operating centre in Chalk Lane.

South Eastern & Metropolitan Traffic Commissioner Christopher Heaps proposed granting the application with environmental conditions. He invited representations about the effect on Franks' business before coming to a final decision. Although most of the proposed conditions were acceptable to Franks, it was said that his customers

needed vehicles to leave by 5am. Franks had another operating centre at Merston where residents would not be disturbed by such movements but this site had no electricity and he was concerned about security.

Imposing the conditions originally proposed, the TC accepted that the use of the Merston site, three miles away, would cause some inconvenience to the business. However, this was outweighed by the disturbance to local residents that resulted from the movement of vehicles at unsocial hours in Chalk Lane.

The TC added that residents had alleged Franks had been operating more than two vehicles and two trailers from Chalk Lane since 2001. He warned that if vehicles were operated in breach of the licence conditions action might well be taken against the licence.