1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146 
Flagrant disregard
Page 41
If you've noticed an error in this article please click here to report it so we can fix it.
• When giving his decision to an application by R. H. Stevens Ltd., of Macclesfield (CM January 23) the North Western deputy LA Mr. A. H. Jolliffe, said that the applicant company had shown flagrant disregard of its 13 licence conditions.
Mr. Jolliffe was addressing Stevens' representative, Mr. J. A. Backhouse, in Manchester recently. The deputy LA said that he would have refused the application outright had it not been for the need for transport shown by Manchester Liners Ltd.
Mr. Jolliffe granted four of the seven vehicles sought by Stevens on a new A licence. The other three vehicles would remain on B licence. The B licence variation to delete four trailers and add four trailers, incorporating in the new conditions "skeletal", was granted. The other variation to add to the conditions on that B licence, "goods in containers within 170 miles of base", was refused.