AT THE HEART OF THE ROAD TRANSPORT INDUSTRY.

Call our Sales Team on 0208 912 2120

Quarry firm narrowly loses bid for contract extension

5th October 2006, Page 16
5th October 2006
Page 16
Page 16, 5th October 2006 — Quarry firm narrowly loses bid for contract extension
Close
Noticed an error?
If you've noticed an error in this article please click here to report it so we can fix it.

Which of the following most accurately describes the problem?

A NORFOLK QUARRY company is licking its wounds after being refused planning permission to extend a contract it has had since the 1950s, following a campaign by local residents.

Folkes Plant and Aggregates may have to lay off 10 staff when its contract to extract minerals at the Welcome Pit site in Burgh Castle, near Great Yarmouth, expires in 2008. Residents had complained that too many trucks already travel down the country lanes, causing noise and dust near a number of holiday parks.

Folkes' proposal would have introduced "a restoration scheme that is considered to be more comprehensive and ecologically advantageous than the current schemes", according to its application. The project was backed by Burgh Castle Parish Council and county councillor Trevor Wainwright.

However, the council's planning regulatory committee decided that any benefits for local residents and visitors would not outweigh those resulting from ending activity at the pit.

Company manager Kevin Lee reports that its bid was lost by a single vote.

The rejection will prevent it from quarrying sand and gravel from 2008, but it will still crush concrete and rubble at the site, so traffic levels won't be affected.

"It doesn't make sense to us, it was short-sighted," he adds. "I agree there are camps around us, but they moved in after us. We'll have to diversify into something else."

The company is considering an appeal.