1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188 
Hadn't heard of GV9
Page 45
If you've noticed an error in this article please click here to report it so we can fix it.
• James Moffat Junior (Contractors) Ltd, of Edinburgh, received an 0 licence at Edinburgh on Tuesday for its existing three vehicles, limited to three years, but was refused the three additional vehicles that it had applied for.
From March 1, said Mr Campbell Wardlaw, representing the company, it had adopted a weekly and monthly documented check system. The MoT check on the three vehicles in January showed one to be deficient and an immediate prohibition was issued. It was accepted that tyres, brakes and steering were defective. Mr Moffat said that this was his first knowledge of the GV9 system and he hoped it would be his last. Mr A. B. Birnie, the Scottish LA, said that the firm ought to have known the requirements and the routines involved.