1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192 
Weatheria-, , gives the final word There are lots of things
Page 45
If you've noticed an error in this article please click here to report it so we can fix it.
we like about the FM9.380, even if we can't deliver a definitive verdict on its economy, which is as frustrating for us as it is for you. The 9.4-litre engine is a real eye-opener, although it's fair to say that as long as it's willing to work hard drivers will work it hard, which isn't
necessarily conducive to maximum economy, giving more credence to the 'big engine working lazy is better' theory. Where the FM9 will flourish is on maximum-payload work where performance isn't critical, such as a bulk blower in the Fens, but clearly you won't be buying cne for stone-carrying duties in the Peak District! Volvo has come up with a very driveable machine which defies all the wisdom on small-capacity diesels and confirms the Swedes' ability to build a top-handling eightlegger. If only they could create more room in the FM cab—and solve that mirror conundrum.