AT THE HEART OF THE ROAD TRANSPORT INDUSTRY.

Call our Sales Team on 0208 912 2120

Severe warning

4th April 1996, Page 18
4th April 1996
Page 18
Page 18, 4th April 1996 — Severe warning
Close
Noticed an error?
If you've noticed an error in this article please click here to report it so we can fix it.

Which of the following most accurately describes the problem?

Keywords : Traffic Law

• Derek Greenhill, who trades as UK Express Systems, was given a severe warning about his maintenance standards when he appeared at a Birmingham disciplinary inquiry And Greenhill was ordered to have all his vehicles tested within 28 days.

Recovery precedent

• A decision of a judge at Worcester Crown Court that a mobile workshop operated by Longhope, Gloucestershirebased Richard Read Transport, was exempt from 0-licensing as it fell within the definition of a "recovery vehicle" is to be challenged in the High Court by the Vehicle Inspectorate.

First time only

• There is no second chance with continuous licensing said South Wales TC John Pugh, when he renewed Cuddy Ltd's licence for 24 vehicles and six trailers. If any vehicle attracted a prohibition which showed a significant failure in maintenance, then the licence would be terminated, he warned.

£39,900 appeal

• I )arlaston-based National Home Care is to appeal to Wolverhampton Crown Court after being ordered to pay -fines and costs totalling 09,900. The company had admitted permitting its drivers to exceed the drivers' hours limits and to take insufficient rest, before West Bromwich magistrates.


comments powered by Disqus