AT THE HEART OF THE ROAD TRANSPORT INDUSTRY.

Call our Sales Team on 0208 912 2120

luilding ban hreatens Laulier's usiness

3rd September 1971
Page 31
Page 31, 3rd September 1971 — luilding ban hreatens Laulier's usiness
Close
Noticed an error?
If you've noticed an error in this article please click here to report it so we can fix it.

Which of the following most accurately describes the problem?

No one complained for three-and-a-half .rs as Mr John Wynne operated a Llage and agricultural business virtually m the roadside outside his home at ;land Bank, Lower Wych, Malpas, ashire.

lut as soon as he took his five vehicles the road and put them under cover, he into trouble with Tarvin rural district ncil. For the premises had been erected tout planning permission.

+low he is preparing to present his case L public inquiry, which is to be held into appeal against the council's refusal to w the buildings.

4r Wynne started building the three-bay 0 sq ft garage next door to his home, r new regulations required that there it be proper accommodation for vehicle ntenance.

I admit I knew we had to have planning nission, but we had to have some sort of lities otherwise I would have had to go of business," he said. "I had three iths to comply. so I started building, submitted plans later, expecting them to hrough without any trouble."

'arvin council decided, however, that the ding was unacceptable on three different Inds—its effect on the rural amenities, hazardous road access and its untidy earance. And an enforcement notice was ed on him, ordering him to remove the tge and restore the site to its original dition.

he clerk to Tarvin council, Mr Norman d, commented: "It is harsh but people set up these businesses must know need planning permission. It amazes that any businessman will sink capital a venture knowing that any time he can virtually put out of business by ething like this."

Er Rudd confirmed that Mr Wynne Id continue operating unhindered ling the result of the public inquiry.

Tags

Organisations: Tarvin council

comments powered by Disqus